Back

GPT Image 2.5 leads on edits, trails on base photorealism in side-by-side tests

Official ChatGPT Images 2.5 promotional still with sculpted letterforms

OpenAI's ChatGPT Images 2.5 claims sharper edits and lower latency than Images 2.0. Side-by-side tests favored Nano Banana Pro for starting photos and Image 2.5 for multi-reference edits.

OpenAI on Sept. 8, 2026, launched ChatGPT Images 2.5, claiming sharper detail, more precise editing and up to about 50% lower latency versus Images 2.0, plus Sketch and templates and API variants Flare and Sunburst.

Independent side-by-side tests of Sunburst via Magnific against Nano Banana Pro favored Nano Banana Pro on starting photos and Image 2.5 on multi-reference composition, outfit edits, billboard and text swaps, style matching and product replacement. That comparison is creator judgment.

Creator judgment: zoomed faces can show fractal or oversharpened texture, repeated edit chains oversharpened images, and posters still needed typography cleanup. A common workflow is to generate the base elsewhere, then use Image 2.5 for controlled changes.

Those tests put 4K generation at about $1 on Magnific. Those cost and quality lines are creator tests, not OpenAI benchmarks.

  • @curiousrefuge Video

    A filmmaking review ran Sunburst via Magnific against Nano Banana Pro and others. Starting photos favored Nano Banana Pro. Multi-reference edits favored Image 2.5.

    Watch on YouTube

Sources

Source moments

  1. 0:00-0:36 : Images 2.5 launch framing; compare vs hype
  2. 2:05-2:15 : Flare vs Sunburst; tests use Sunburst
  3. 3:08-3:18 / 3:58-4:20 : ~$1 per 4K on Magnific; fractal face texture caveat
  4. 6:55-7:13 : Nano Banana Pro preferred for base photorealism (creator judgment)
  5. 10:18-11:51 : "most intelligent" claim; multi-reference composition win vs Nano
  6. 11:53-12:55 : multi-turn outfit edits; earlier-context hair behavior
  7. 14:08-14:56 : billboard compositing / text wrap swap demos
  8. 16:35-17:25 : chained edits degrade quality
  9. 19:55-20:34 : final verdict / workflow + cost note